2,065
edits
Changes
no edit summary
DMC/SandT/2024/07 '''Singapore''' '''Marchand Navigation Co v Olam Global Agri Pte Ltd and Sinco Shipping Pte Ltd (The “Maria Theo 1”)''' General Division of the High Court: Justice Kwek Mean Luck: [2023] SGHC 339: 29 November 2023:[[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Marchand_Navigation_v_Olam_Global_Agri_&_Sinco_Shipping_-_The_Maria_Theo_1]] Judgment available at: https://www.elitigation.sg/gd/s/2023_SGHC_339 '''LIEN: WHETHER OWNERS ENTITLED TO EXERCISE THE LIEN PURSUANT TO CLAUSE 18 NYPE 1946 FORM OVER DEMURRAGE DUE TO HEAD-CHARTERERS UNDER SUB-CHARTER''' '''ARBITRATION: ARBITRATION CLAUSE PROVIDING FOR “ANY DISPUTE ARISING OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THIS CONTRACT“ TO BE EXCLUSIVELY REFERRED TO ARBITRATION IN LONDON: WHETHER COURT PROCEEDINGS SHOULD BE STAYED IN FAVOUR OF ARBITRATION: WHAT CONSTITUTES A “DISPUTE”''' DMC/SandT/24/06 '''England''' '''Southeaster Maritime Ltd v Trafigura Maritime Logistics Pte Ltd (The “Aquafreedom”)''' '''English Commercial Court: Jacobs J: [2024] EWHC 255 (Comm): 8 February 2024:[[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Southeaster_Maritime_v_Trafigura_Maritime_Logistics_-_The_Aquafreedom]] Judgment Available on BAILII @ https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Comm/2024/255.html '''TIME CHARTER: WHETHER TIME CHARTER CONCLUDED: IMPACT OF A “SUBJECT” OF “CHARTERERS’ MANAGEMENT APPROVAL” WHERE “ALL TERMS” NOT AGREED BY THE PARTIES BEFOREHAND: APPLICATION FOR DECLARATION THAT NO LEGALLY BINDING CONTRACT CONCLUDED''' DMC/SandT/24/05 '''England''' '''MSC Mediterranean Shipping Company S.A. v Conti 11. Container Schiffahrts – GmbH & Co KG MS & Others (The “MSC Flaminia” (No. 2))''' English Court of Appeal: Males and Falk LJJ and Sir Launcelot Henderson: [2023] EWCA Civ 1007: 1 September 2023:[[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/MSC_Mediterranean_Shipping_S.A._v_Conti_11_Container_Schiffarhts_GmbH_KG_MS_&_Others_-_The_MSC_Flaminia_No.2]] Judgment Available on BAILII @ https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2023/1007.html '''TIME CHARTER: 1976 CONVENTION ON LIMITATION OF LIABILITY FOR MARITIME CLAIMS: WHETHER TIME CHARTERERS ENTITLED TO LIMIT THEIR LIABILITY UNDER ARTICLE 2 OF 1976 CONVENTION AGAINST HEAD OWNERS FOR CONSEQUENCES OF EXPLOSION LEADING TO FIRE ON BOARD VESSEL, DESTROYING HUNDREDS OF CONTAINERS, CAUSING EXTENSIVE DAMAGE TO VESSEL AND INCURRING SUBSTANTIAL EXPENSES RELATED TO REPAIRS TO VESSEL: APPEAL ON A QUESTION OF LAW'''' DMC/SandT/24/04 '''England''' '''JB Cocoa SDN BHD & Others v Maersk Line AS (The “Maersk Chennai”)''' '''English Commercial Court: HHJ Keyser KC: [2023] EWHC 2203 (Comm): 5 September 2023: [[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/JB_Cocoa_Sdn_Bhd_v_Maersk_Line_AS_-_The_Maersk_Chennai]] Judgment Available on BAILII @ https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Comm/2023/2203.html '''CLAIM FOR CARGO DAMAGE ARISING AFTER DISCHARGE: LIABILITY OF CARRIER: WHETHER EXCLUSION CLAUSE IN BILL OF LADING VALID''' DMC/SandT/24/03 '''England''' '''Herculito Maritime Limited v Gunvor International BV (The “Polar”)''' '''UK Supreme Court: Lord Hodge, Lord Hamblen, Lord Leggatt, Lady Rose and Lord Richards: [2024] UKSC 2: 17 January 2024:[[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Herculito_Maritime_v_Gunvor_International_-_Supreme_Court_Decision_-_The_Polar]] Judgment Available on BAILII @ https://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKSC/2024/2.html/ '''BILL OF LADING: VOYAGE CHARTER: WHETHER BILLS OF LADING INCORPORATED CHARTERPARTY “CODE” BY WHICH CHARTERERS’ OBLIGATION TO PAY ADDITIONAL WAR RISKS INSURANCE PREMIA HAD ENTITLED THE BILL OF LADING HOLDERS TO THE BENEFIT OF THE WAR RISK INSURANCES: WHETHER BILL OF LADING HOLDERS LIABLE TO COMPENSATE OWNERS FOR CARGO’S PROPORTION OF GENERAL AVERAGE ARISING FROM PAYMENT OF RANSOM TO PIRATES: ARBITRATION ACT 1996 SECTION 69 APPEAL ON QUESTION OF LAW''' DMC/SandT/24/02 '''England''' '''Litasco SA v Der Mond Oil & Gas Africa SA''' '''English Commercial Court: Foxton J: [2023] EWHC 2866 (Comm): 15 November 2023:[[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Litasco_SA_v_Der_Mond_Oil_and_Gas_SA]] Judgment Available on BAILII @ https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Comm/2023/2866.html '''APPLICATION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON CLAIM FOR UNPAID PART OF PURCHASE PRICE FOR CRUDE OIL: TRADE SANCTIONS: WHETHER APPLICABLE UNDER RELEVANT CONTRACT: WHETHER 2019 REGULATIONS APPLIED: WHETHER PRESIDENT PUTIN'S POSITION AS HEAD OF A COMMAND ECONOMY MEANT THAT HE WAS IN "CONTROL" OF ANY PARTY TO THESE PROCEEDINGS: WHETHER THERE WAS ANY COMPELLING REASON WHY THE DISPUTE SHOULD GO TO TRIAL''' DMC/SandT/24/01 '''England''' '''Mercuria Energy Trading Pte Ltd v Raphael Cotoner Investments Limited (The “Afra Oak”)''' '''English Commercial Court: Sir Nigel Teare: [2023] EWHC 2978 (Comm): 23 November 2023:[[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Mercuria_Energy_Trading-v-Raphael_Cotoner_Investments_-_The_Afra_Oak]]''' Judgment Available on BAILII @ https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Comm/2023/2978.html '''VOYAGE CHARTER: EXXONVOY FORM: US COGSA INCORPORATED: CHARTERERS ORDERED VESSEL ONCE LADEN TO AWAIT FURTHER ORDERS AT SINGAPORE EOPL: MASTER CHANGED ANCHORAGE LOCATION AFTER DEPARTING LOADING PORT AND ANCHORED ILLEGALLY IN INDONESIAN TERRITORIAL WATERS CAUSING PROLONGED DETENTION: WHETHER SECTION 4(2)(A) OF US COGSA/ARTICLE IV(2)(A) OF HAGUE RULES PROVIDED A DEFENCE IN SUCH CIRCUMSTANCES: APPEAL FROM FINAL AWARD ON QUESTION OF LAW UNDER SECTION 69 OF ARBITRATION ACT 1996 DMC/SandT/23/10 '''England''' '''Star Axe I LLC v Royal & Sun Alliance Luxembourg S.A. and Others (The “Star Antares”)''' English Commercial Court: Butcher J: [2023] EWHC 2784 (Comm): 10 November 2023:[[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Star_Axe_1_v_Royal_&_Sun_Alliance_and_Ors_-_The_Star_Antares] Judgment Available on BAILII @ https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Comm/2023/2784.html '''BILLS OF LADING: CONGENBILL 1994 FORM: GENERAL AVERAGE (“GA”): YORK-ANTWERP RULES (“YAR”): WHETHER YAR 1994 OR YAR 2016 APPLIED TO ADJUSTMENT, STATEMENT AND SETTLMENT IN LONDON OF GA INCIDENT ARISING IN 2021''' DMC/SandT/23/09 '''England''' '''FIMBank plc v KCH Shipping Co Ltd (The “Giant Ace”)''' '''English Court of Appeal: Males, Popplewell and Nugee LJJ: [2023] EWCA Civ 569: 24 May 2023:[[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/FIMBank_v_KCH_Shipping_-_The_Giant_Ace]]''' Judgment Available on BAILII @ https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2023/569.html '''BILLS OF LADING: MISDELIVERY OF CARGO: WHETHER TIME LIMIT FOR CLAIMS AGAINST THE CARRIER IN ARTICLE III, RULE 6 OF THE HAGUE VISBY RULES APPLIES TO CLAIMS FOR MISDELIVERY OF CARGO AFTER DISCHARGE FROM THE VESSEL: ARBITRATION ACT 1996 SECTION 69 APPEAL ON A POINT OF LAW''' DMC/SandT/23/08 '''England''' '''Smart Gain Shipping Co Ltd v Langlois Enterprises Ltd (The “Globe Danae”)''' '''English Commercial Court: Sir Ross Cranston, sitting as a High Court Judge: [2023] EWHC 1683 (Comm): 5 July 2023:[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Smart_Gain_Shipping_Co_v_Langlois_Enterprises_-_The_Globe_Danae]] Judgment Available on BAILII @ https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Comm/2023/1683.html '''TIME CHARTER: ONE TIME CHARTER TRIP: HULL FOULING CLAUSE: VESSEL REDELIVERED WITH FOULED HULL AFTER PROLONGED STAY AT DISCHARGE PORT IN TROPICAL WATERS: WHETHER OWNERS ENTITLED TO CLAIM AS A DEBT THE TIME USED TO CLEAN HULL AT NET HIRE RATE OR CONFINED TO A CLAIM FOR DAMAGES FOR ANY LOSS OF USE OF THE VESSEL: APPEAL ON QUESTION OF LAW PURSUANT TO SECTION 69 OF THE ARBITRATION ACT 1996''' DMC/SandT/23/07 '''England''' '''Rhine Shipping DMCC v Vitol S.A. (The “Dijilah”)'''DMC/SandT/23/08 England Smart Gain Shipping Co Ltd v Langlois Enterprises Ltd (The “Globe Danae”) English Commercial Court: Sir Ross Cranston, sitting as a High Court Judge: [2023] EWHC 1683 (Comm): 5 July 2023 Judgment Available on BAILII @ https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Comm/2023/1683.html Nigel Jacobs KC (instructed by Winter & Co Solicitors LLP) for Smart Gain Shipping (Charterers) Stewart Buckingham KC and Tom Nixon (instructed by Ince & Co) for Langlois Enterprises (Owners) TIME CHARTER: ONE TIME CHARTER TRIP: HULL FOULING CLAUSE: VESSEL REDELIVERED WITH FOULED HULL AFTER PROLONGED STAY AT DISCHARGE PORT IN TROPICAL WATERS: WHETHER OWNERS ENTITLED TO CLAIM AS A DEBT THE TIME USED TO CLEAN HULL AT NET HIRE RATE OR CONFINED TO A CLAIM FOR DAMAGES FOR ANY LOSS OF USE OF THE VESSEL: APPEAL ON QUESTION OF LAW PURSUANT TO SECTION 69 OF THE ARBITRATION ACT 1996 English Commercial Court: Simon Birt KC, sitting as a Deputy Judge of the High Court: [2023] EWHC 1265 (Comm): 26 May 2023:[[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Rhine_Shipping_DMCC_v_Vitol_S.A._-_The_Dijilah]] Judgment Available on BAILII @ https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Comm/2023/1265.html '''VOYAGE CHARTER: BPVOY4 FORM: CLAUSE 13 INDEMNITY: ALSO WARRANTY THAT OWNERS, MANAGERS, DISPONENT OWNERS AND VESSEL FREE OF LEGAL ISSUES: PROPERTY ON VESSEL ARRESTED: DELAY TO LOADING OF CARGO AT SECOND LOADPORT: DELAY CAUSED INCREASE IN COST OF PURCHASING CARGO: WHETHER INDEMNITY AND WARRANTY APPLIED: WHETHER LOSS TOO REMOTE OR WHETHER NO ASSUMPTION OF RESPONSIBILITY BY OWNERS: WHETHER CHARTERERS’ “GAINS” FROM ENTERING INTO INTERNAL HEDGING ARRANGEMENTS FOLLOWING OWNERS’ BREACH OF CHARTER TO BE BROUGHT INTO ACCOUNT: WHETHER CLAIMS UNDER INDEMNITY SUBJECT TO REMOTENESS OF LOSS RULES FOR BREACH OF CONTRACT''' DMC/SandT/23/06 '''England''' '''Unicredit Bank AG v Euronav NV (The “Sienna”)''' '''English Court of Appeal: [2023] EWCA Civ 471: Asplin, Popplewell and Falk LJJ.: 4 May 2023:[[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Unicredit_Bank_AG_v_Euronav_NV_-_The_Sienna]] '''CLAIM UNDER BILL OF LADING (“BL”) FOR DELIVERY OF CARGO WITHOUT PRODUCTION OF ORIGINAL BL: BL ‘MERE RECEIPT’ WHILE IN HANDS OF CHARTERER/SELLER: CHARTERER NOVATED CHARTERPARTY TO THE BUYER: BL SUBSEQUENTLY ENDORSED BY THE CHARTERER TO THE BANK, AFTER DISCHARGE OF CARGO: WHETHER BL WAS A CONTRACT OF CARRIAGE, GIVING THE BANK RIGHTS AGAINST THE OWNERS: WHETHER, IF SO, DELIVERY OF CARGO WITHOUT PRODUCTION OF THE BL WAS CAUSATIVE OF THE LOSS''' DMC/SandT/23/05 '''England''' '''Trafigura Pte Ltd v TKK Shipping Pte Ltd (The “Thorco Lineage”)''' '''English Commercial Court: Sir Nigel Teare: [2023] EWHC 26 (Comm): 12 January 2023:[[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Trafigura_v_TKK_Shipping_-_The_Thorco_Lineage]] Judgment Available on BAILII @ https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Comm/2023/26.html '''BILL OF LADING: VESSEL GROUNDED DUE TO LOSS OF POWER LEADING TO SALVAGE OF VESSEL AND CARGO: SALVORS EXERCISED A MARITIME LIEN ON CARGO: CARGO INTERESTS OBLIGED TO PUT UP SECURITY TO OBTAIN CARGO: CARGO INTERESTS ALSO INCURRED EXPENSE TO ON-SHIP CARGO TO INTENDED PORT OF DISCHARGE: WHETHER ARTICLE IV(5)(A) OF THE HAGUE-VISBY RULES REGARDING FINANCIAL LIMITS OF LIABILITY OF CONTRACTUAL CARRIERS BASED UPON THE WEIGHT OF THE “GOODS LOST OR DAMAGED” INCLUDED ALSO GOODS THAT WERE ECONOMICALLY DAMAGED, NOT JUST THOSE PHYSICALLY LOST OR DAMAGED BY THE CASUALTY: DETERMINATION OF A POINT OF LAW UNDER SECTION 45 OF THE ARBITRATION ACT 1996''' DMC/SandT/23/04 '''England''' '''Pan Ocean Co Ltd v Daelim Corporation (The “DL Lilac”)''' '''English Commercial Court: Sir Ross Cranston: [2023] EWHC 391 (Comm): 24 January 2023: [[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Pan_Ocean_Co_v_Daelim_Corporation_-_The_DL_Lilac]] Judgment Available on BAILII @ https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Comm/2023/391.html '''TRIP TIME CHARTER: AMENDED NYPE 93 FORM: HOLD INSPECTION PERIOD OFF-HIRE CLAUSE: HOLDS FAILED INITIAL INSPECTION: HOLDS RECLEANED AND MASTER REQUESTED REINSPECTION: CHALLENGE TO FINAL AWARD IN OWNERS’ FAVOUR FOR LOSS OF HIRE AND COST OF BUNKERS CONSUMED FOR BREACH OF IMPLIED TERM THAT CHARTERERS WOULD ARRANGE FOR PROMPT REINSPECTION OF HOLDS: APPEAL ON QUESTION OF LAW UNDER SECTION 69 OF THE ARBITRATION ACT 1996''' DMC/SandT/23/03 '''England''' '''UniCredit Bank AG v Euronav NV (“The Sienna”)''' '''English Commercial Court: [2022] EWHC 957 (Comm) 28 April 2022: [[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/UniCredit_Bank_v_Euronav_-_The_Sienna]] Judgment Available on BAILII @ https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Comm/2022/957.html '''CARRIAGE OF FUEL OIL: VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY: NOVATION OF CHARTERPARTY TO NEW CHARTERERS: FAILURE TO ENDORSE THE BILL OF LADING: TITLE TO SUE SHIPOWNERS FOR MISDELIVERY: NEW CHARTERERS HAVING “LIQUIDITY DISTRESS: WHETHER A NEW CONTRACT “SPRANG UP” WHERE THE BILL OF LADING AS A RECEIPT WAS NOT ENDORSED''' DMC/SandT/23/02 '''England''' '''Fastfreight Pte Ltd v Bulk Trident Shipping Ltd (The “Anna Dorothea”)''' '''English Commercial Court: Henshaw J: [2023] EWHC 105 (Comm): 24 January 2023:[[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Fastfreight_v_Bulk_Trident_Shipping_-_The_Anna_Dorothea]] Judgment Available on BAILII @ https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Comm/2023/105.html '''TIME CHARTER TRIP: CHALLENGE TO PARTIAL FINAL AWARD FOR HIRE NOT PAID IN RELATION TO PURPORTED COVID-19 RELATED OFF-HIRE EVENT: WHETHER NON-PAYMENT A ‘DEDUCTION’ UNDER A PROVISION THAT PROVIDED FOR NO DEDUCTIONS FROM HIRE (INCLUDING FOR OFF-HIRE OR ALLEGED OFF-HIRE) WITHOUT OWNERS’ CONSENT: APPEAL ON QUESTION OF LAW UNDER SECTION 69 OF THE ARBITRATION ACT 1996''' DMC/SandT/23/01 '''England''' '''FIMBank plc v KCH Shipping Co Ltd (The “Giant Ace”)''' '''English Commercial Court: Sir William Blair: [2022] EWHC 2400 (Comm): 28 September 2022: [[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/FIMBank_Plc_v_KCH_Shipping_Co_-_The_Giant_Ace] Judgment Available on BAILII @ https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Comm/2022/2400.html '''BILLS OF LADING: MISDELIVERY OF CARGO: WHETHER TIME LIMIT FOR CLAIMS AGAINST THE CARRIER IN ARTICLE III, RULE 6 OF THE HAGUE VISBY RULES APPLIES TO CLAIMS FOR MISDELIVERY OF CARGO AFTER DISCHARGE FROM THE VESSEL: ARBITRATION ACT 1996 SECTION 69 APPEAL ON A POINT OF LAW''' DMC/SandT/22/18 '''England''' '''CM P-Max III Ltd v Petroleos del Norte SA (The “Stena Primorsk”)''' '''English Commercial Court: HHJ Bird: [2022] EWHC 2147 (Comm): 12 August 2022: [[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/CM_P-Max_III_Ltd_v_Petroleos_del_Norte_SA_-_The_Stena_Primorsk]] Judgment Available on BAILII @ https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Comm/2022/2147.html '''VOYAGE CHARTER: SHELLVOY 6 FORM: DEMURRAGE: WHETHER DRAUGHT SUFFICIENT FOR VESSEL TO BERTH AND TO REMAIN ALWAYS SAFELY AFLOAT WHILST DISCHARGING CARGO: UNDER KEEL CLEARANCE (“UKC”) POLICY: WHETHER REFUSAL TO WAIVE BREACH OF UKC POLICY JUSTIFIED: VALIDITY OF NOTICE OF READINESS: WHETHER FREE PRATIQUE GRANTED BY DEFAULT''' DMC/SandT/22/17 '''England''' '''MUR Shipping BV v RTI Ltd''' '''English Court of Appeal: Newey, Males & Arnold LLJ: [2022] EWCA Civ 1406: 27 October 2022: [[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/MUR_Shipping_BV_v_RTI_Ltd_-_Court_of_Appeal_decision]] Judgment Available on BAILII @ https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Comm/2022/467.html '''CONTRACT OF AFFREIGHTMENT: FORCE MAJEURE EVENT: US RUSSIAN SANCTIONS PREVENTED PAYMENT OF FREIGHT IN US DOLLARS: WHETHER “REASONABLE ENDEAVOURS” EXTENDED TO ACCEPTING PAYMENT IN (NON-CONTRACTUAL) EUROS INSTEAD OF (CONTRACTUAL) US DOLLARS: WHETHER OWNERS OBLIGED TO “OVERCOME” FORCE MAJEURE EVENT BY ACCEPTING ALTERNATIVE PERFORMANCE OF PAYMENT OBLIGATION: ARBITRATION ACT 1996 SECTION 69 APPEAL ON A POINT OF LAW''' DMC/SandT/22/16 '''England''' '''Eastern Pacific Chartering Inc v Pola Maritime Ltd (The “Divinegate”)''' '''English Commercial Court: Deputy Judge Clare Ambrose: [2022] EWHC 2095 (Comm): 10 August 2022:[[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Eastern_Pacific_Chartering_v_Pola_Maritime_-_the_Divinegate]] Judgment Available on BAILII @ https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Comm/2022/2095.html '''TIME CHARTER TRIP: BALANCE HIRE, BUNKERS AND EXPENSES CLAIMED BY OWNERS: WHETHER CHARTERERS COULD ANSWER CLAIM BY WAY OF COUNTERCLAIMS: DAMAGES CLAIM IN TORT FOR ALLEGED WRONGFUL VESSEL ARREST: ALLEGED UNDERPERFORMANCE OF VESSEL ON VOYAGE''' DMC/SandT/22/15 '''England''' '''OCM Maritime Nile LCC & Another v Courage Shipping Co & Others (The “Courage” and “Amethyst”)''' '''English Court of Appeal: Underhill, Newey & Males LLJ: [2022] EWCA Civ 1091: 29 July 2022:[[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/OCM_Maritime_Nile_LLC_&_Anor_v_Courage_Shipping_Co_&_Ors_-_The_Courage_&_The_Amethyst]] Judgment Available on BAILII @ https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2022/1091.html '''BAREBOAT CHARTERPARTIES: BARECON 2001: DEFAULT EVENTS: US IRANIAN SANCTIONS AGAINST SOLE BENEFICIAL OWNER AND DIRECTOR OF CHARTERERS: TERMINATION OF CHARTERS: WHETHER OWNERS HAD RIGHT TO REPOSSESS VESSELS UNDER CLAUSE 46: WHETHER CHARTERERS ENTITLED TO RELIEF AGAINST FORFEITURE''' DMC/SandT/22/14 '''England''' '''Ai Giorgis Oil Trading Ltd v AG Shipping & Energy Pte Ltd (The “Marquessa”)''' '''English Commercial Court: Henshaw J: [2021] EWHC 2319 (Comm): 17 August 2021:[[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Ai_Giorgis_Oil_Trading_Ltd_v_AG_Shipping_&_Energy_Pte_Ltd_-_The_Marquessa]] Judgment Available on BAILII @ https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Comm/2021/2319.html '''TIME CHARTER: TERMINATION: CLAIM FOR UNPAID HIRE: EFFECT OF SUSPENSION OF VESSEL’S PERFORMANCE ON RIGHT TO HIRE: CLAIM FOR DAMAGES CONSEQUENT ON VESSEL HAVING TO COMPLETE THE CARRYING VOYAGE FOR CARGO LOADED ON CHARTERERS’ ORDERS BEFORE OWNERS TERMINATED CHARTER ON BASIS OF CHARTERERS’ REPUDIATION OR RENUNCIATION: SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON MERITS''' DMC/SandT/22/13 '''England''' '''NKD Maritime Ltd v Bart Maritime (No. 2) Inc (The “Shagang Giant”)''' '''English Commercial Court: Butcher J: [2022] EWHC 1615 (Comm): 24 June 2022:[[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/NKD_Maritime_v_Bart_Maritime_No.2_-_The_Shagang_Giant]] Judgment Available on BAILII @ https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Comm/2022/1615.html '''VESSEL SALE AND PURCHASE AGREEMENT (“MOA”): SHIPBREAKING: BUYER PAID INITIAL PAYMENT DUE TO SELLER UNDER MOA: BUYER LATER TERMINATED THE MOA AND CLAIMED BACK THE INITIAL PAYMENT: SELLER ACCEPTED TERMINATION AS REPUDIATION OF MOA AND CLAIMED DAMAGES FOR BREACH: WHETHER TERMINATION OF MOA VALID: WHETHER LOCKDOWN MEASURES OR RESTRICTIONS IMPOSED BY INDIAN GOVERMENT AS A RESULT OF THE ONSET OF COVID-19 CONSTITUTED OR GAVE RISE TO A RELEVANT FORCE MAJEURE EVENT''' DMC/SandT/22/12 '''England''' '''Pacific Pearl Co Ltd v Osios David Shipping Ltd (The “Panamax Alexander” and “Osios David”)''' '''English Court of Appeal: Lewison, Males and Snowden LLJ: [2022] EWCA Civ 798: 14 June 2022:[[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Pacific_Pearl_Co_v_Osios_David_Shipping_-_The_Panamax_Alexander_and_Osios_David)]] Judgment Available on BAILII @ https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2022/798.html '''COLLISION BETWEEN SHIPS: SECURITY AND JURISDICTION: STANDARD FORM WORDINGS OF ADMIRALTY SOLICITORS’ GROUP: ASG 1 – LETTER OF UNDERTAKING (“LOU”): ASG 2 – COLLISION JURISDICTION AGREEMENT: FORMS DESIGNED TO BE USED TOGETHER: PER ASG 2, SECURITY TO BE PROVIDED “IN A REASONABLY SATISFACTORY FORM TO THE OTHER [PARTY]”: WHETHER ADDITION OF INTERNATIONAL GROUP OF P&I CLUBS’ APPROVED SANCTIONS CLAUSE TO ASG 1 LOU WORDING RENDERED IT UNSATISFACTORY: WHETHER A PARTY IS OBLIGED TO ACCEPT REASONABLY SATISFACTORY SECURITY''' DMC/SandT/22/11 '''England''' '''Nautical Challenge Ltd v Evergreen Marine (UK) Limited [2022] EWHC 206 (Admlty)''' High Court of Justice, Queen’s Bench Division, Admiralty Court: Sir Nigel Teare, with Commodore Walworth and Captain Barker, Elder Brethren of Trinity House, as Nautical Assessors: [[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Nautical_Challenge_v_Evergreen_Marine_UK_-_The_Alexandra_1_and_the_Ever_Smart]] '''COLLISION: APPORTIONMENT OF LIABILITY: CONVENTION ON THE INTERNATIONAL REGULATIONS FOR PREVENTING COLLISIONS AT SEA 1972 (COLREGS): CROSSING RULE (RULE 15): NARROW CHANNEL RULE (RULE 9): ACTION BY GIVE-WAY VESSEL (RULE 16): ACTION BY STAND-ON VESSEL (RULE 17): CAUSATIVE POTENCY: RELATIVE BLAMEWORHTINESS: COMPELLING NECESSITY''' DMC/SandT/22/10 '''England''' '''SK Shipping Europe Ltd v Capital VLCC 3 Corp and Capital Maritime & Trading Corp (The “C Challenger”)''' '''English Court of Appeal: Males, Phillips and Carr LLJ: [2022] EWCA Civ 231: 25 February 2022: [[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/SK_Shipping_Europe_Ltd_v_Capital_VLCC_3_Corp_&_Capital_Maritime_&_Trading_Corp_-_The_C_Challenger]] Judgment Available on BAILII @ https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2022/231.html '''TIME CHARTER: SPEED AND CONSUMPTION: REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES: CONSUMPTION WARRANTY QUALIFIED BY 0.5 KNOT MARGIN: VESSEL UNDERPERFORMED: WHETHER PRE-CONTRACTUAL MISREPRESENTATIONS OF PERFORMANCE “EMBEDDED” IN CHARTER: WHETHER MISREPRESENTATIONS INDUCED CHARTERERS TO ENTER INTO CHARTER: WHETHER CHARTER AFFIRMED BY CHARTERERS ORDERING VESSEL ON LONG VOYAGE DESPITE GENERAL RESERVATION OF RIGHTS''' DMC/SandT/22/09 '''England''' '''DHL Project & Chartering Ltd v Gemini Ocean Shipping Co Ltd (The “Newcastle Express”)''' '''English Commercial Court: Jacobs J: [2022] EWHC 181 (Comm): 31 January 2022: [[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/DHL_Project_Chartering_v_Gemini_Ocean_Shipping_-_The_Newcastle_Express]]''' Judgment Available on BAILII @ https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Comm/2022/181.html '''VOYAGE CHARTER: WHETHER VOYAGE CHARTER CONCLUDED: WHETHER BINDING ARBITRATION AGREEMENT CONCLUDED: WHETHER ARBITRATOR HAD SUBSTANTIVE JURISDICTION TO MAKE AWARD: WHETHER “SUBJECT SHIPPER/RECEIVERS APPROVAL” OF THE VESSEL PROVISION IN RECAP WAS ITSELF SUBJECT TO “APPROVAL NOT TO BE UNREASONABLY WITHHELD” TERM IN INCORPORATED PROFORMA CHARTER: APPLICATIONS UNDER SECTIONS 67 AND 69 OF ARBITRATION ACT 1996''' DMC/SandT/22/08 '''England''' '''A v B [2021] EWHC 793 (Comm)''' '''English High Court, Queen's Bench Division: Henshaw J: 31 March 2021:[[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/A_v_B]] Judgment available on BAILII @ https://www.bailii.org/cgi-bin/format.cgi?doc=/ew/cases/EWHC/Comm/2021/793.html&query=(.2021.)+AND+(EWHC)+AND+(793)+AND+((Comm)) '''SALE OF GOODS: BUYERS MAKING INVALID NOMINATION OF VESSEL AND SELLERS PURPORTING TO TERMINATE CONTRACT: WHETHER INVALID NOMINATION A BREACH OF CONDITION: WHETHER NOMINATED VESSEL HAD TO HAVE BEEN ALREADY CHARTERED BY BUYERS: WHETHER BUYERS’ OBLIGATION TO PROVIDE COPY OF CHARTERPARTY WAS A CONDITION''' DMC/SandT/22/07 '''England''' '''OCM Maritime Nile LCC & Another v Courage Shipping Co & Others (The “Courage” and “Amethyst”)''' '''English Commercial Court: Sir Andrew Smith: [2022] EWHC 452 (Comm): 4 March 2022:[[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/OCM_Maritime_Nile_&_Anor_v_Courage_Shipping_Co_&_Ors_-_The_Courage_and_The_Amethyst]] Judgment Available on BAILII @ https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Comm/2022/452.html '''BAREBOAT CHARTERPARTIES: BARECON 2001: DEFAULT EVENTS: US IRANIAN SANCTIONS AGAINST SOLE BENEFICIAL OWNER AND DIRECTOR OF CHARTERERS: TERMINATION OF CHARTERS: WHETHER OWNERS HAD RIGHT TO REPOSSESS VESSELS UNDER CLAUSE 46: WHETHER RIGHT TO REPOSSESSION AN UNENFORCEABLE PENALTY UNDER CLAUSES 28, 29 & 46: WHETHER CHARTERERS ENTITLED TO RELIEF AGAINST FORFEITURE''' DMC/SandT/22/06 '''England''' '''CVLC THREE CARRIER CORP & ANOR v. ARAB MARITIME PETROLEUM TRANSPORT COMPANY [2021] EWHC 551 (Comm)''' '''English High Court: Commercial Court: Mrs Justice Cockerill DBE: 11 March 2021: [[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/CVLC_Three_Carrier_Corp_v_Arab_Maritime_Petroleum_Transport_Company]] Judgment available on BAILII @ https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Comm/2021/551.html '''CHALLENGE TO ARBITRATION AWARD FOR ERROR OF LAW UNDER S.69 ARBITRATION ACT 1996: WHETHER TRIBUNAL ERRED IN LAW IN IMPLYING A TERM PRECLUDING CREDITORS’ RIGHT TO SEEK ADDITIONAL SECURITY FOR ALLEGED BREACH BY PERFORMANCE GUARANTOR UNDER THE CONTRACT OF GUARANTEE.''' DMC/SandT/22/05 '''England''' '''MUR Shipping BV v RTI Ltd''' '''English Commercial Court: Jacobs J: [2022] EWHC 467 (Comm): 3 March 2022:[[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/MUR_Shipping\-BV_v_RTI_Ltd]] Judgment Available on BAILII @ https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Comm/2022/467.html '''CONTRACT OF AFFREIGHTMENT: FORCE MAJEURE EVENT: US RUSSIAN SANCTIONS PREVENTED PAYMENT OF FREIGHT IN US DOLLARS: WHETHER “REASONABLE ENDEAVOURS” EXTENDED TO ACCEPTING PAYMENT IN (NON-CONTRACTUAL) EUROS INSTEAD OF (CONTRACTUAL) US DOLLARS: ARBITRATION ACT 1996 SECTION 69 APPEAL ON A POINT OF LAW''' DMC/SandT/22/04 '''England''' '''Stema Shipping (UK) Limited & Others v RTE, Réseau de Transport d’Electricité SA & Others (The “Stema Barge II”)''' '''Court of Appeal: Phillips LJ, Sir David Richards and Sir Launcelot Henderson: [2021] EWCA Civ 1880: 15 December 2021: [[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Stema_Shipping_(UK)_v_RTE_-_The_Stema_Barge_II]] Judgment Available on BAILII @ https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2021/1880.html '''LIMITATION OF LIABILITY: CONVENTION ON LIMITATION OF LIABILITY FOR MARITIME CLAIMS 1976: INTERPRETATION OF ARTICLE 1(2): MEANING OF “MANAGER OR OPERATOR OF A SEAGOING SHIP”: ANCHOR OF UNMANNED BARGE CAUSING DAMAGE TO ELECTRICITY CABLE''' DMC/SandT/22/03 '''England''' '''Space Shipping Ltd v ST Shipping and Transport Pte Ltd [2021] EWHC 2288 (Comm)''' High Court of Justice Queen’s Bench Division Commercial Court: Sir Nigel Teare : 13 August 2021:[[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Space_Shipping_v_ST_Shipping_and_Transport]] Judgment available on BAILII @ https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Comm/2021/2288.html '''CHALLENGE TO ARBITRATION AWARD FOR ERROR OF LAW UNDER S.69 ARBITRATION ACT 1996: WHETHER TRIBUNAL ERRED IN LAW IN DEDUCTING SAVED DRYDOCKING COSTS FROM ITS AWARD OF AN INDEMNITY TO DISPONENT OWNERS AGAINST SUB-CHARTERERS FOR THE CONSEQUENCES SUFFERED BY THE DISPONENT OWNERS UNDER THE HEAD CHARTERPARTY WHICH HAD BEEN CAUSED BY THE CHARTERERS’ BREACH OFTHE SUB-CHARTERPARTY''' DMC/SandT/22/02 '''England''' '''M/V Pacific Pearl Co. Limited v Osios David Shipping Inc.''' '''High Court, Queen’s Bench Division, Commercial Court: Sir Nigel Teare: [2021] EWHC 2808 (Comm), 21 October 2021: [[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/M/V_Pacific_Pearl_Co._Limited_v_Osios_David_Shipping_Inv]] '''COLLISION BETWEEN SHIPS: SECURITY AND JURISDICTION: STANDARD FORM WORDINGS OF ADMIRALTY SOLICITORS GROUP: ASG 1 - LETTER OF UNDERTAKING: ASG 2 - COLLISION JURISDICTION AGREEMENT: FORMS DESIGNED TO BE USED TOGETHER: UNDER ASG 2, SECURITY TO BE PROVIDED “IN A REASONABLY SATISFACTORY FORM”: WHETHER PRESENCE OF SANCTIONS CLAUSE IN ASG 1 RENDERS IT NOT REASONABLY SATISFACTORY SECURITY UNDER ASG 2: RISK OF NON-PAYMENT: WHETHER A PARTY IS OBLIGED TO ACCEPT SECURITY THAT IS IN REASONABLY SATISFACTORY FORM''' DMC/SandT/22/01 '''England''' '''Herculito Maritime Limited v Gunvor International BV (The “Polar”)''' '''Court of Appeal: Peter Jackson and Males LJJ and Sir Patrick Elias: [2021] EWCA Civ 1828: 1 December 2021:[[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Herculito_Maritime_v_Gunvor_International_-_The_Polar]] Judgment Available on BAILII @ https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2021/1828.html '''BILL OF LADING: VOYAGE CHARTER: WHETHER BILLS OF LADING INCORPORATED CHARTERPARTY “CODE” BY WHICH CHARTERERS’ OBLIGATION TO PAY ADDITIONAL WAR RISKS INSURANCE PREMIUMS HAD BEEN ASSUMED TO ENTITLE THEM TO THE BENEFIT OF THE WAR RISK INSURANCES: WHETHER BILL OF LADING HOLDERS LIABLE TO COMPENSATE OWNERS FOR CARGO’S PROPORTION OF GENERAL AVERAGE ARISING FROM PAYMENT OF RANSOM TO PIRATES: ARBITRATION ACT 1996 SECTION 69 APPEAL ON POINT OF LAW''' DMC/SandT/21/19 '''Singapore''' '''Charles Lim Teng Siang and another v Hong Choon Hau and another [2021] SGCA 43''' '''In the Court of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore: Civil Appeal No 49 of 2020 in the matter of Suit 920 of 2018: Decision of the Court of Appeal (delivered by Steven Chong JCA), 1 March 2021: Sundaresh Menon CJ, Judith Prakash JCA, Belinda Ang Saw Ean JAD, Andrew Phang Boon Leong JCA, Steven Chong JCA:[[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Charles_Lim_Teng_Siang_v_Hong_Choon_Hau]] '''CONTRACT: NO-ORAL MODIFCIATION (NOM) CLAUSE: PREVENTION OF VARIATION, SUPPLEMENT, DELETION AND REPLACEMENT OF TERMS OF CONTRACT UNLESS BY WRITING AND SIGNED BY OR ON BEHALF OF ALL PARTIES: WHETHER APPLICABLE TO RESCISSION: EXPRESS OR IMPLIED INTENTION TO DEPART FROM NOM CLAUSE''' DMC/SandT/21/18 '''England''' '''K Line Pte Ltd v Priminds Shipping (HK) Co Ltd (The “Eternal Bliss”)'''/'''Court of Appeal: Sir Geoffrey Vos (Master of the Rolls), Newey and Males LJJ: [2021] EWCA Civ: 7 November 2021:[[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/K_Line_v_Priminds_Shipping_HK_-_The_Eternal_Bliss]] Judgment Available on BAILII @ https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2021/1712.html '''CONTRACT OF AFFREIGHTMENT: CHARTERERS IN BREACH OF OBLIGATION TO DISCHARGE VESSEL WITHIN LAYTIME AND LIABLE TO PAY DEMURRAGE: CHARTERERS NOT IN BREACH OF ANY OTHER OBLIGATION –“SOLE BREACH”: DELAY LED TO CLAIM BY RECEIVERS AGAINST OWNERS FOR CARGO DETERIORATION: WHETHER OWNERS ENTITLED TO RECOVER SUM PAID TO SETTLE CARGO CLAIM AS DAMAGES OR UNDER IMPLIED INDEMNITY AGAINST CHARTERERS: WHETHER DEMURRAGE PAID BY CHARTERERS THE EXCLUSIVE REMEDY FOR CONSEQUENCES OF BREACH: DETERMINATION OF PRELIMINARY QUESTION OF LAW UNDER SECTION 45 OF THE ARBITRATION ACT 1996''' DMC/SandT/21/17 '''England''' '''Alize 1954 and CMA CGM SA v Allianz Elementar Versicherungs AG and Others (The “CMA CGM Libra”)''' '''United Kingdom Supreme Court: Lords Reed (President), Briggs, Hamblen, Leggatt and Lady Arden: [2021] UKSC 51: 10 November 2021:[[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Alize_1954_and_CMA_CGM_SA_v_Allianz_Versicherungs_AG_and_Ors_-_the_CMA_CGM_Libra]] ''' Judgment Available on BAILII @ https://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKSC/2021/51.html '''OWNERS’ CLAIM FOR CONTRIBUTION IN GENERAL AVERAGE (“GA”): NEGLIGENT VOYAGE PLANNING BY MASTER CAUSED GROUNDING OF VESSEL LEADING TO GA EXPENDITURE TO REFLOAT THE VESSEL: WHETHER CARGO INTERESTS ENTITLED TO DEFEND CLAIM ON THE BASIS THAT OWNERS FAILED TO EXERCISE DUE DILIGENCE TO MAKE THE VESSEL SEAWORTHY BEFORE AND AT THE BEGINNING OF THE VOYAGE: ARTICLE III, RULE 1 AND ARTICLE IV, RULE 2(A) OF THE HAGUE/HAGUE-VISBY RULES''' DMC/SandT/21/16 '''England''' '''SK Shipping Europe plc v Capital VLCC 3 Corp and Capital Maritime & Trading Corp (The “C Challenger”)''' '''English Commercial Court: Foxton J: [2020] EWHC 3448 (Comm): 16 December 2020: [[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/SK_Shipping_Europe_v_Capital_VLCC_3_Corp_&_Another_-_The_C_Challenger''']] Judgment Available on BAILII @ https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Comm/2020/3448.html '''TIME CHARTER: SPEED AND CONSUMPTION: REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES: VESSEL UNDERPERFORMANCE: WHETHER OWNERS FRAUDULENTLY MISREPRESENTED VESSEL PERFORMANCE: WHETHER CHARTERERS ENTITLED TO RESCIND CHARTER AND CLAIM DAMAGES: WHETHER CHARTER REPUDIATED BY CHARTERERS: WHETHER OWNERS ENTITLED TO DAMAGES FOR UNPERFORMED CHARTER PERIOD''' DMC/SandT/21/15 '''England''' '''Euronav N.V. v Repsol Trading S.A. (The “Maria”)''' '''English Commercial Court: Henshaw J: [2021] EWHC 2565 (Comm): 24 September 2021: [[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Euronav_N_V_v_Repsol_Trading_-_The_Maria]]''' Judgment Available on BAILII @ https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Comm/2021/2565.html '''VOYAGE CHARTER: DEMURRAGE: SHELLVOY 6 FORM: CLAUSE 15(3) REQUIREMENT TO GIVE NOTIFICATION OF DEMURRAGE CLAIM TO CHARTERERS “WITHIN 30 DAYS AFTER COMPLETION OF DISCHARGING” FAILING WHICH CLAIM BECOMES TIME-BARRED: BASIS ON WHICH DATE OF COMPLETION OF DISCHARGE SHOULD BE ASCERTAINED: WHETHER OWNERS’ DEMURRAGE CLAIM TIME-BARRED: SUMMARY JUDGMENT''' DMC/SandT/21/14 '''England''' '''Regal Seas Maritime S.A. v Oldendorff Carriers GmbH & Co KG (The “New Hydra”)''' '''English Commercial Court: Teare J: [2021] EWHC 566 (Comm): 11 March 2021:[[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Regal_Seas_Maritime_v_Oldendorff_Carriers_-_The_New_Hydra]] '''TIME CHARTER: RATE OF HIRE BASED ON AVERAGE OF LAST 15 DAYS’ PUBLISHED 4 TIME CHARTER ROUTES OF BALTIC CAPESIZE INDEX (“BCI”) PLUS 4% FOR VESSEL SIZE ADJUSTMENT: VESSEL WAS 179,258 DEADWEIGHT TONNES (“DWT”): BCI ‘BENCHMARK’ VESSEL WAS 172,000 DWT WHEN CHARTER AGREED: BCI ‘BENCHMARK’ VESSEL CHANGED TO 180,000 DWT DURING CHARTER PERIOD: WHETHER AN IMPLIED TERM THAT VESSEL SIZE ADJUSTMENT WOULD BE REASONABLY AMENDED IF ‘BENCHMARK’ VESSEL SIZE CHANGED DURING CHARTER PERIOD: SECTION 69 APPEAL ON POINT OF LAW UNDER ARBITRATION ACT 1996''' DMC/SandT/21/13 '''England''' '''Jiangsu Guoxin Corporation Ltd v Precious Shipping Public Co. Ltd [2020] EWHC 1030 (Comm)''' '''English Commercial Court: Mr Justice Butcher:[[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Jiangsu_Guoxin_Corporation_v_Precious_Shipping_Public_Co.]] '''SHIPBUILDING CONTRACT ON AMENDED SAJ FORM: SELLER CONTENDED UNLAWFUL REJECTION BY BUYER: REPUDIATORY BREACH: PARTIAL FINAL AWARDS: APPEAL UNDER S69 OF ARBITRATION ACT 1996: APPLICATION OF THE PREVENTION PRINCIPLE: DEFINITION OF PERMISSBILE DELAYS UNDER ARTICLE VIII.1: NOTICE PROVISIONS FOR EXTENSIONS OF TIME UNDER ARTICLE VIII.2''' DMC/SandT/21/12 '''England''' '''Navision Shipping A/S v Precious Pearls Ltd & Conti Lines Shipping NV v Navision Shipping A/S (The “Mookda Naree”)''' '''English Commercial Court: Andrew Baker J: [2021] EWHC 558 (Comm): 10 March 2021:[[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Navision_Shipping_v_Precious_Pearls_&_Conti_Lines_v_Navision_Shipping_-_The_Mookda_Naree]] '''TIME CHARTER: ASBATIME FORM: VESSEL ARRESTED IN WEST AFRICA FOR CARGO CLAIM RELATED TO SHIPMENT OF SUB-SUB-CHARTERERS ON A DIFFERENT VESSEL: WHETHER VESSEL OFF-HIRE BY REASON OF ACT OR OMISSION OF SUB-CHARTERERS (CLAUSE 47): WHETHER VESSEL OFF-HIRE UNDER WEST AFRICAN CARGO CLAIM CLAUSE (CLAUSE 86): SECTION 69 APPEAL ON POINT OF LAW UNDER ARBITRATION ACT 1996''' DMC/SandT/21/11 '''England''' '''Alpha Marine Corp v Minmetals Logistics Zhejiang Co Ltd (The “Smart”)''' '''English Commercial Court: Butcher J: [2021] EWHC 1157 (Comm): 5 May 2021:[[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Alpha_Marine_v_Minmetals_Logistics_Zhejiang_-_The_Smart]] '''TIMECHARTER: OWNERS’ BILLS OF LADING ISSUED INCORPORATING (SUB) VOYAGE CHARTER TERMS: FREIGHT DEEMED EARNED ON LOADING CARGO AND TO BE PAID WITH 45 DAYS AND AFTER RECEIPT OF FREIGHT INVOICE: WHETHER IMPLIED TERM THAT OWNERS WOULD NOT DIRECT PAYMENT TO THEMSELVES OF FREIGHT DUE UNDER BILLS OF LADING WHERE NOTHING WAS DUE TO THEM UNDER THE TIMECHARTER: SECTION 69 APPEAL ON POINT OF LAW UNDER ARBITRATION ACT 1996''' DMC/SandT/21/10 '''England''' '''Sea Tank Shipping AS v (1) Vinnlustodin HF & (2) Vatryggingafelag Islands FH – the “Aqasia”''' '''England and Wales Court of Appeal (Civil Division), on appeal from the Queen’s Bench Division, Commercial Court: Lady Justice Gloster, David Richards and Flaux LJJ: [2018] EWCA Civ 276: [[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Sea_Tank_Shipping_v_Vinnlustodin_HF_&_Or_-_the_Aqasia]]''' '''CARRIAGE OF GOODS BY SEA: PACKAGE LIMITATION: 1924 HAGUE RULES ARTICLE IV RULE 5: MEANING OF UNIT: WHETHER PACKAGE LIMITATION APPLIES TO BULK CARGO''' '''DMC/SandT/21/09 '''England''' '''K Line Pte Ltd v Priminds Shipping (HK) Co Ltd (The “Eternal Bliss”)''' '''English Commercial Court: Andrew Baker J: [2020] EWHC 2373 (Comm): 7 September 2020:[[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/K_Line_Pte_Ltd_v_Priminds_Shipping_(HK)_Co_Ltd_-_The_Eternal_Bliss]] '''CONTRACT OF AFFREIGHTMENT: CHARTERERS IN BREACH OF OBLIGATION TO DISCHARGE VESSEL WITHIN LAYTIME AND LIABLE TO PAY DEMURRAGE: CHARTERERS NOT IN BREACH OF ANY OTHER OBLIGATION –“SOLE BREACH”: DELAY LED TO CLAIM BY RECEIVERS AGAINST OWNERS FOR CARGO DETERIORATION: WHETHER OWNERS ENTITLED TO RECOVER SUM PAID TO SETTLE CARGO CLAIM AS DAMAGES OR UNDER IMPLIED INDEMNITY AGAINST CHARTERERS: WHETHER DEMURRAGE PAID BY CHARTERERS THE EXCLUSIVE REMEDY FOR CONSEQUENCES OF BREACH: DETERMINATION OF PRELIMINARY QUESTION OF LAW UNDER SECTION 45 OF THE ARBITRATION ACT 1996''' DMC/SandT/21/08 '''England''' '''Herculito Maritime Ltd v Gunvor International BV''' '''English High Court: Teare J.: [2020] EWHC 3318 (Comm): 4 December 2020: [[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Herculito_Maritime_Ltd_v_Gunvor_International_BV]]''' '''ARBITRATION ACT 1996 SECTION 69 APPEAL ON POINT OF LAW: VOYAGE CHARTER: WHETHER BILL OF LADING INCORPORATED CHARTERPARTY “CODE” REGARDING ADDITIONAL WAR RISKS PREMIUMS: WHETHER BILL OF LADING HOLDERS LIABLE TO COMPENSATE SHIPOWNERS FOR LOSSES COVERED BY INSURANCE AGAINST PIRACY RISKS''' DMC/SandT/21/07 '''Singapore''' '''(1) POS Maritime NX S.A. & (2) Pan Ocean Co. Ltd. v. The Owners/bareboat Charterers of MV Caraka Jaya Niaga III-11 - The Caraka Jaya Niaga III-11''' '''High Court of Singapore: Decision delivered by Judicial Commissioner S Mohan: [2021] SGHC 43: 22 February 2021: [[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/The_Caraka_Jaya_Niaga_III_11]''' '''COLLISION: BOTH VESSELS TO BLAME: PLAINTIFFS’ CLAIM ISSUED IN TIME: DEFENDANT’S COUNTERCLAIM ISSUED OUT OF TIME: MARITIME CONVENTIONS ACT OF SINGAPORE: WHETHER COUNTERCLAIM STILL QUALIFIED FOR APPLICATION OF ADMIRALTY SINGLE LIABILITY PRINCIPLE''' DMC/SandT/21/06 '''England''' '''Imperator I Maritime Company v Bunge SA and C Transport Panamax Ltd - The “Coral Seas”''' '''English Commercial Court: Phillips J: [2016] EWHC 1506 (Comm): 24 June 2016: [[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Imperator_I_Maritime_Company_v_Bunge_SA_and_C_Transport_Panamax_Ltd_-_The_“Coral_Seas]]''' '''ARBITRATION ACT 1996 SECTION 69 APPEAL ON POINT OF LAW: TIME CHARTERPARTY: CONTINUING WARRANTY OF SPEED AND CONSUMPTION: VESSEL SUSTAINED UNDERWATER FOULING DUE TO PROLONGED STAY IN TROPICAL WATERS RESULTING IN UNDERPERFORMANCE: WHETHER A DEFENCE FOR OWNERS TO PROVE THAT VESSEL UNDERPERFORMED BECAUSE OF COMPLIANCE WITH CHARTERERS’ ORDERS''' '''DMC/SandT/21/05 '''England''' '''Priminds Shipping (HK) Co Ltd v Noble Chartering Inc, the “Tai Prize” [2021] EWCA Civ 87''' '''Court of Appeal (Civ Div): Bean LJ, Males LJ and Rose LJ: 28 January 2021: [[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Priminds_Shipping_v_Noble_Chartering_-_the_Tai_Prize]] '''VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY: SHIPPERS ACTING AS AGENTS FOR THE CHARTERERS PRESENTED ‘CLEAN ON BOARD’ DRAFT BILL OF LADING FOR MASTER’S SIGNATURE: CARGO APPEARED TO BE IN GOOD ORDER SO BILL OF LADING ISSUED STATING CARGO IN APPARENT GOOD ORDER AND CONDITION: ON DISCHARGE CARGO FOUND TO BE DAMAGED: WHETHER CHARTERERS LIABLE TO DISPONENT OWNERS FOR MISREPRESENTATION''' DMC/SandT/21/04 '''England''' '''Nautica Marine Ltd v Trafigura Trading LLC (The “Leonidas”)''' '''English Commercial Court: Foxton J: [2020] EWHC 1986 (Comm): 28 July 2020: [[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Nautica_Marine_v_Trafigura_Trading_-_the_Leonidas]] '''VOYAGE CHARTER: WHETHER VOYAGE CHARTER CONCLUDED: WHETHER “SUBJECT” OF “SUPPLIERS’ APPROVAL” OF THE VESSEL A PRE-CONDITION OR A PERFORMANCE CONDITION OF THE CONTRACT: WHETHER CHARTERERS UNDER IMPLIED OBLIGATION TO TAKE REASONABLE STEPS TO OBTAIN “SUPPLIERS’ APPROVAL” WITHIN “SUBJECT” DEADLINE''' DMC/SandT/21/03 '''England''' '''Palmali Shipping SA v Litasco SA''' '''English Commercial Court: Foxton J: [2020] EWHC 2581 (Comm): 1 October 2020:[[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Palmali_Shipping_v_Litasco]] '''CONTRACT OF AFFREIGHTMENT (“COA”): OWNERS CLAIMING FOR LOSS OF PROFIT DUE TO CHARTERERS’ FAILURE TO PERFORM SHIPMENTS: OWNERS HAD OPTION TO USE OWN COMPANY GROUP FLEET VESSELS OR THIRD PARTY CHARTERED IN VESSELS TO PERFORM SHIPMENTS: WHETHER OWNERS HAD TO ACCOUNT FOR EXPENSES OF OWN FLEET TO PERFORM SHIPMENTS WHEN QUANTIFYING DAMAGES TO REFLECT NET LOSS OF PROFIT IN SAME WAY AS WHEN INCURRING FREIGHT, DEMURRAGE AND PORT CHARGES WHEN USING THIRD PARTY VESSELS TO PERFORM SHIPMENTS: CHARTERERS’ SUMMARY JUDGMENT APPLICATION''' DMC/SandT/21/02 '''England''' '''Priminds Shipping (HK) Co Ltd v Noble Chartering Inc, the “Tai Prize” [2020] EWHC 127 (Comm)''' '''English Commercial Court (Queen’s Bench Division): HH Judge Pelling QC (sitting as a Judge of the High Court): [[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Priminds_Shipping_(HK)_v_Noble_Chartering_-_The_Tai_Prize]] '''SHIPPERS ACTING AS AGENTS FOR THE CHARTERERS PRESENTED ‘CLEAN ON BOARD’ BILL OF LADING FOR MASTER’S SIGNATURE: CARGO DID APPEAR TO BE IN GOOD ORDER SO BILL OF LADING ISSUED STATING CARGO IN APPARENT GOOD ORDER AND CONDITION:: ON DISCHARGE CARGO FOUND TO BE DAMAGED: WHETHER CHARTERERS LIABLE TO OWNERS AS CARRIER FOR MISREPRESENTATION: EFFECT OF INCLUSION OF HAGUE RULES IN BILL OF LADING''' DMC/SandT/21/01 '''England''' '''English Admiralty Court''' '''1) Splitt Chartering APS (2) Stema Shipping A/S (3) Stema Shipping (UK) Limted & Ors v SAGA Shipholding Norway AS and RTE Reseau de Transport d’Electricité SA & Ors: [2020] EWHC 1294 (Admlty) Queen’s Bench Division (Admiralty Court); Teare J; 22 May 2020;[[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Splitt_Chartering_&_Ors_v_SAGA_Shipholding_&_Ors]]''' '''LIMITATION OF LIABILITY: CONVENTION ON LIMITATION OF LIABILITY FOR MARITIME CLAIMS 1976: INTERPRETATION OF ARTICLE 1(2): MEANING OF “MANAGER OR OPERATOR OF A SEAGOING SHIP”: ANCHOR OF UNMANNED BARGE CAUSING DAMAGE TO ELECTRICITY CABLE''' DMC/SandT/20/14 '''Singapore''' '''China Coal Solution (Singapore) Pte Ltd v Avra Commodities Pte Ltd''' '''Court of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore [2020] SGCA 81, 20 August 2020: Decision of the Court of Appeal delivered by Judith Prakash, JA: [[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/China_Coal_Solution_(Singapore)_v_Avra_Commodities]] '''ALLEGED BREACH OF TRADING CONTRACT: WHETHER CONTRACT HAD BEEN FINALLY CONCLUDED: RELEVANCE OF STANDARD TERMS AND CONDITIONS: RELEVANCE OF PREVIOUS DEALINGS BETWEEN THE PARTIES''' DMC/SandT/20/13 '''England''' '''Sea Master Shipping Inc v Arab Bank (Switzerland) Ltd and Yousef Freiha & Sons SAL (The “Sea Master”)''' '''English Commercial Court: HHJ Pelling QC: [2020] EWHC 2030 (Comm): 28 July 2020: [[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Sea_Master_Shipping_v_Arab_Bank_(Switzerland)_and_Yousef_Freiha_and_Sons_-_The_Sea_Master]] Judgment Available on BAILII @ https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Comm/2020/2030.html '''CONTRACT OF CARRIAGE: BILL OF LADING INCORPORATING VOYAGE CHARTER: CARGO TO BE DISCHARGED FREE OF EXPENSE TO VESSEL: CHARTERERS/RECEIVERS TO ARRANGE AND PAY FOR STEVEDORES: CHARTERERS TO PAY DEMURRAGE: CHARTERERS BECAME INSOLVENT: OWNERS CLAIMED DAMAGES IN LIEU OF DEMURRAGE AGAINST CARGO INTERESTS FOR DELAYED CARGO DISCHARGE: WHETHER CARGO INTERESTS UNDER AN OBLIGATION (1) TO TAKE ALL NECESSARY STEPS TO ENABLE THE CARGO TO BE DISCHARGED AND DELIVERED WITHIN A REASONABLE TIME OR (2) TO DISCHARGE THE CARGO WITHIN A REASONABLE TIME: ARBITRATION ACT 1996 SECTION 69 APPEAL ON POINT OF LAW''' DMC/SandT/20/12 '''England'''/ '''Tricon Energy Ltd v MTM Trading LLC (The “MTM Hong Kong”)''' '''English Commercial Court: Robin Knowles J: [2020] EWHC 700 (Comm): 23 March 2020: [[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Tricon_Energy_v_MTM_Trading_-_The_MTM_Hong_Kong]] '''VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY: PART CARGOES: DEMURRAGE CLAIMS PRESENTATION TIME BAR CLAUSE: OWNERS OBLIGED TO PRESENT CLAIM WITH “ALL SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS” WITHIN TIME BAR: OWNERS DID NOT PRESENT COPIES OF BILLS OF LADING RELEVANT TO PRO-RATING CALCULATION OF LAYTIME AND DEMURRAGE BETWEEN TWO DIFFERENT CARGO PARCELS HANDLED AT THE SAME BERTH: WHETHER DEMURRAGE CLAIM BARRED FOR WANT OF PRESENTATION OF BILLS OF LADING IN TIME: ARBITRAITON ACT 1996 SECTION 69 APPEAL ON POINT OF LAW''' DMC/SandT/20/11 '''England''' '''Cargill International Trading Pte Ltd v Uttam Galva Steels Limited (Commercial Court): Bryan J: [2019] EWHC 476 (Comm): 28 February 2019: [[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Cargill_International_Trading_v_Uttam_Galva_Steels]] '''SUMMARY JUDGMENT: CONTRACT TERM: DEFAULT COMPENSATION CLAUSE: INTEREST RATE: WHETHER UNENFORCEABLE AS A PENALTY: WHETHER INCORPORATED INTO RELEVANT CONTRACT: WHETHER ONEROUS OR UNUSUAL TERM: ILLEGALITY UNDER INDIAN LAW''' DMC/SandT/20/10' '''England''' '''Ocean Perfect Shipping Limited v Dampskibsselskabet Norden AS''' '''English Queen’s Bench (Commercial Court): Teare J: [2019] EWHC 3368 (Comm): 6 December 2019: [[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Ocean_Perfect_Shipping_v_Dampskibsselskabet_Norden_AS]''' '''BRITISH REGISTERED VESSEL: GROUNDING WHILST ON CHARTER: MARITIME CASUALTY: MARINE ACCIDENT INVESTIGATION BRANCH (MAIB) SAFETY INVESTIGATION REPORT: MERCHANT SHIPPING (ACCIDENT REPORT AND INVESTIGATION) REGULATIONS 2012: WHETHER ARBITRATION JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS: WHETHER REPORT TO BE ADMITTED: COURT’S PERMISSION: DISCRETION''' DMC/SandT/20/09 '''England''' '''Alize 1954 and CMA CGM SA v Allianz Elementar Versicherungs AG and Others (The “CMA CGM Libra”)''' '''English Court of Appeal: Flaux, Haddon-Cave and Males LLJ: [2020] EWCA Civ 293: 4 March 2020:[[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Alize_1954_and_CMA_CGM_SA_v_Allianz_Elementar)Versicherungs_AB_-_The_CMA_CGM_Libra]] Judgment Available on BAILII @ https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2020/293.html '''CLAIM FOR CONTRIBUTION IN GENERAL AVERAGE: NEGLIGENT VOYAGE PLANNING BY THE VESSEL’S OFFICERS CAUSED GROUNDING OF VESSEL LEADING TO EXPENDITURE IN THE NATURE OF GENERAL AVERAGE TO REFLOAT THE VESSEL: WHETHER CARGO INTERESTS ENTITLED TO DEFEND THE CLAIM ON THE BASIS THAT OWNERS HAD FAILED TO EXERCISE DUE DILIGENCE TO MAKE THE VESSEL SEAWORTHY BEFORE AND AT THE BEGINNING OF THE VOYAGE: ARTICLE III, RULES 1 AND 2 AND ARTICLE IV, RULE 2(A) OF THE HAGUE/HAGUE-VISBY RULES''' DMC/SandT/20/08 '''England''' '''Alianca Navegacao E Logistica Ltda v Ameropa SA (The “M/V Santa Isabella”)''' '''English Commercial Court: Andrew Henshaw QC (sitting as a High Court Judge): [2019] EWHC 3152 (Comm): 22 November 2019:[[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Alianca_Navegacao_E_Logistica_v_Ameropa_SA_-_The_Santa_Isabella]] Judgment Available on BAILII @ https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Comm/2019/3152.html '''VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY:OWNERS CLAIM FOR DEMURRAGE:CHOICE OF REASONABLE ROUTE:WHETHER OWNERS WERE IN BREACH OF ART III RULE 2 OF THE HAGUE RULES OR LIABLE FOR DEVIATION:SPEED/REASONABLE DESPATCH: WHETHER THE VESSEL FAIILED TO PROCEED TO DURBAN WITH ALL CONVENIENT SPEED AND/OR IN ACCORDANCE WITH WARRANTED SPEED: CARGO CARE: WHETHER THE CARGO WAS PROPERLY AND CAREFULLY VENTILATED IN ACCORDANCE WITH A SOUND SYSTEM''' DMC/SandT/20/07 '''England''' '''Globalink Transportation & Logistics Worldwide LLP v DHL Project & Chartering Ltd''' '''English Commercial Court: Nicholas Vineall QC: 29 January; 19 February: [2019] EWHC 225 (Comm): [[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Globalink_Transportation_&_Logistics_v_DHL_Project_&_Chartering]]''' '''CONTRACT FOR FREIGHT FORWARDING SERVICES: WHETHER CLAIM FOR CARGO DAMAGE COULD BE SET-OFF AGAINST CLAIM FOR FREIGHT''' DMC/SandT/20/06 '''Singapore''' '''Oversea-Chinese Banking Corporation v Jiang Xin Shipping (“YUE YOU 902”)''' '''Singapore High Court: Pang Khang Chau, Judicial Commissioner: [2019] SGHC 106:[[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Overseas_-_Chinese_Banking_Corporation_v_Jiang_Xin_Shipping_-_The_Yue_You_902]]''' '''BILLS OF LADING: MISDELIVERY: WHETHER HOLDER’S KNOWLEDGE THAT CARGO HAD BEEN DISCHARGED BEFORE TAKING UP THE BILLS OF LADING DEFEATED A MISDELIVERY CLAIM: WHETHER HOLDER IN FACT HAD THAT KNOWLEDGE AT THAT TIME''' DMC/SandT/20/05 '''England''' '''“Amalie Essberger” Tankreederei GmbH & Co KG v Marubeni Corporation (The “Amalie Essberger”)''' '''English Commercial Court: Peter MacDonald Eggers QC (sitting as a Deputy Judge of the High Court): [2019] EWHC 3402 (Comm): 11 December 2019: [[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Amalie_Essberger_Tankreederei_v_Marubeni_Corporation_-_The_Amalie_Essberger]] '''VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY: DEMURRAGE CLAIMS PRESENTATION TIME BAR CLAUSE: OWNERS OBLIGED TO PRESENT CLAIM WITH SUPPORTING DOCUMENT WITHIN 90 DAYS OF CARGO DISCHARGE COMPLETION: OWNERS PROVIDED PUMPING LOGS AND LETTER OF PROTEST FROM THE LOADING PORT EARLY TO CHARTERERS TO COMPLY WITH ANOTHER CLAUSE: WHETHER CLAIM TIME BARRED FOR WANT OF PRESENTATION OF THOSE TWO DOCUMENTS AT THE SAME TIME AS LATER DEMURRAGE CLAIM: APPLICATION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT UNDER CPR RULE 24.2''' DMC/SandT/20/04 '''England''' '''Volcafe Ltd and Others v Cia Sud Americana de Vapores SA''' '''Supreme Court: Lord Reed DPSC, Lords Wilson, Sumption, Hodge and Kitchin JJSC; [2018] UKSC 61; 5 December 2018: [[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Volcafe_and_Ors_v_CSAV]] '''SHIPPING: BILL OF LADING: HAGUE RULES: WHETHER BURDEN ON CARRIER TO PROVE DAMAGE TO GOODS CAUSED WITHOUT NEGLIGENCE OR DUE TO INHERENT VICE: INHERENT VICE''' DMC/SandT/20/03 '''England''' '''MUR Shipping B.V. v Louis Dreyfus Company Suisse S.A. (The “Tiger Shanghai”)''' '''English Commercial Court: Cockerill J: [2019] EWHC 3240 (Comm): 13 November 2019:[[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/MUR_Shipping_v_Louis_Dreyfus_Company_Suisse_-_The_Tiger_Shanghai]]''' '''TIME CHARTERPARTY: ALL CLAIMS PRESENTATION TIME BAR CLAUSE: OWNERS REFUSED TO ALLOW CEMENT FEEDER HOLES TO BE DRILLED IN HATCH COVERS: CHARTERERS’ CONTEMPORANEOUS SURVEY REPORT CONCLUDED OWNERS HAD NO GOOD REASONS FOR REFUSAL: REPORT RELIED ON BY CHARTERERS IN ARBITRATION BUT NOT PRESENTED WITHIN THE 12 MONTHS’ TIME BAR: WHETHER CLAIM TIME BARRED FOR WANT OF PRESENTATION OF “ALL AVAILABLE SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS (WHETHER RELATING TO LIABILITY OR QUANTUM OR BOTH)”: ARBITRATION ACT 1996 SECTION 69 APPEAL ON POINTS OF LAW''' DMC/SandT/20/02 '''England''' '''Quiana Navigation SA v Pacific Gulf Shipping (Singapore) Pte Ltd (The “Caravos Liberty”)''' '''English Commercial Court: Cockerill J: [2019] EWHC 3171 (Comm): 21 November 2019: [[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Quiana_Navigation_v_Pacific_Gulf_Shipping_(Singapore)_-_The_Caravos_Liberty]] '''TIME CHARTERPARTY: WITHDRAWAL OF VESSEL FOR NON-PAYMENT OF HIRE: BIMCO NON-PAYMENT OF HIRE CLAUSE: WHETHER LAWFUL TO WITHDRAW VESSEL FOR NON-PAYMENT OF HIRE THAT FELL DUE ON AN EARLIER DATE: ARBITRATION ACT 1996 SECTION 69 APPEAL ON POINTS OF LAW''' DMC/SandT/20/01 '''England''' '''Transgrain Shipping (Singapore) Pte Ltd v Yangtze Navigation (Hong Kong) Co Ltd''' '''English Court of Appeal: Longmore, Hamblen, Henderson LJJ: [2017] EWCA Civ 2107:[[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Transgrain_Shipping_(Singapore)_v_Yangtze_Navigation_(Hong_Kong)_Court_of_Appeal]]''' '''CHARTERPARTY (TIME): NYPE INTER-CLUB AGREEMENT 1996, CLAUSE 8(D): WHETHER “ACT” REQUIRES FAULT''' DMC/SandT/19/10 '''England''' '''Eleni Shipping Limited v Transgrain Shipping B.V. (The “Eleni P”):[[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Eleni_Shipping_v_Transgrain_Shipping_-_The_Eleni_P]] '''English Commercial Court: Popplewell J: [2019] EWHC 910 (Comm): 10 April 2019''' '''TIME CHARTERPARTY: NYPE 46 FORM: VESSEL CAPTURED BY PIRATES IN THE ARABIAN SEA: WHETHER VESSEL WAS OFF-HIRE: ARBITRATION ACT 1996 SECTION 96 APPEAL ON POINTS OF LAW''' DMC/SandT/19/09 '''England''' '''A v B (The “GA”)''' '''English Commercial Court: Sir Ross Cranston: [2018] EWHC 2325 (Comm): 7 September 2018: [[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/A_B_The_GA]]''' '''TIME CHARTERPARTY: AMENDED SHELLTIME 4 FORM: VLCC OIL TANKER CHARTERED-IN THEN SUB-CHARTERED TO POOL: OIL MAJOR ELIGIBILITY CLAUSE (“OMEC”) BY WHICH VESSEL GUARANTEED AT ALL TIMES (1) TO HAVE A VALID SHIP INSPECTION REPORT (“SIRE”) PROGRAMME REPORT REGISTERED ON THE SIRE SYSTEM AND NOT MORE THAN SIX MONTHS’ OLD, AND (2) TO BE ELIGIBLE FOR BUSINESS FROM AT LEAST FOUR OIL MAJORS: VESSEL BECAME UNEMPLOYABLE DUE TO CRITICAL SIRE REPORT FOLLOWED BY LAPSE OF SIRE REPORT: VESSEL PLACED OFF-HIRE DUE TO BREACH OF GUARANTEES THEN LATER REDELIVERED TO OWNERS: QUANTIFICATION OF CLAIM FOR LOSS AND DAMAGE CAUSED BY BREACHES OF OMEC: WHETHER NET LOSS OF PROFITS AND WASTED COSTS COULD BOTH BE CLAIMED: WHETHER LOSS OF PROFITS DAMAGES WERE TO BE DISCOUNTED ON LOSS OF CHANCE BASIS: ARBITRATION ACT 1996 SECTION 69 APPLICATION TO APPEAL AWARD ON POINTS OF LAW''' DMC/SandT/19/08 '''England''' '''Ark Shipping Company LLC v Silverburn Shipping (IOM) Ltd''' '''English Court of Appeal: Gross LJ, McCombe LJ, Leggatt LJ: 2019 EWCA Civ 1161: 12 July 2019: [[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Ark_Shipping_Co_v_Silverburn_Shipping_(IOM)_-_The_Arctic]] '''BARECON 1989 CHARTERPARTY: CHARTERERS’ OBLIGATION TO MAINTAIN THE VESSEL’S CLASS STATUS: WHETHER THIS A CONDITION OR AN INNOMINATE TERM''' DMC/SandT/19/07
'''England'''
'''Deep Sea Maritime Limited v Monjasa A/S (The “Alhani”)'''
'''English Commercial Court: David Foxton QC (sitting as a Deputy Judge of the High Court): [2018] EWHC 1495 (Comm): 15 June 2018: ''' '''[[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Deep_Sea_Maritime_v_Monjasa_-_The Alhani_The_Alhani]]'''
'''BILL OF LADING: CARGO MISDELIVERY WITHOUT PRESENTATION OF ORIGINAL BILL: CLAUSE 1 OF BILL INCORPORATING EXCLUSIVE ENGLISH JURISDICTION & LAW CLAUSE OF A CHARTERPARTY: CLAUSE 2 OF BILL INCORPORATING HAGUE RULES 1924: WHETHER ONE-YEAR TIME BAR IN ARTICLE III RULE 6 OF 1924 RULES APPLIES TO CARGO MISDELIVERY CLAIMS: WHETHER LEGAL PROCEEDINGS COMMENCED IN TIME IN WRONG (FOREIGN) FORUM CAN STOP TIME BAR EXPIRING IN CORRECT (ENGLISH) FORUM: WHETHER CARRIER (OWNERS) ENTITLED TO A DECLARATION OF NON-LIABILITY ON A SUMMARY JUDGMENT BASIS'''
'''CONSTRUCTION OF ART. 3(4) SECOND PARAGRAPH, INTERNATIONAL CONVENTION RELATING TO THE ARREST OF SEA-GOING SHIPS 1952'''
]]